Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2016 Regular Season SIM 22.2 Complete - Next SIM Sunday 05/15

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ryan
    replied
    Originally posted by Delandis View Post
    A (Indy not Fun) Clown original.
    My favorite player ever.

    Originally posted by Sharkn20 View Post
    Amazing player

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
    He deserved better from 'ole Ryan, that's for sure!

    Leave a comment:


  • umd
    replied
    Originally posted by Andrew View Post
    If you want them removed from all leaderboards it's easier to just delete them from the game I think. But if people want to keep them and umd wants to see his leaderboards without them it's pretty easy to do. As a test I removed Woodbury and Chavez from the seasonal batting averages:

    http://www.simgamingnetwork.com/blb/...100&team_id=13

    This page is just a copy so the actual page still includes them:

    http://www.simgamingnetwork.com/blb/...100&team_id=13
    Awesome. Thanks. I'll write up a proposal to be voted on with some ideas this weekend. As much as the Clay Era is a huge part of history, I'd like my other players to be recognized as DVS guys.

    Leave a comment:


  • BDub
    replied
    If UMD wants his franchise Clay-free, he should have it Clay-free.

    Leave a comment:


  • Carlos
    replied
    Originally posted by Andrew View Post
    If you want them removed from all leaderboards it's easier to just delete them from the game I think. But if people want to keep them and umd wants to see his leaderboards without them it's pretty easy to do. As a test I removed Woodbury and Chavez from the seasonal batting averages:

    http://www.simgamingnetwork.com/blb/...100&team_id=13

    This page is just a copy so the actual page still includes them:

    http://www.simgamingnetwork.com/blb/...100&team_id=13
    It would be a nice surprise when Clay anonymously visits the home page to look at his work.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkn20
    replied
    If everyone is agree, I think UMD deserves that players to be removed from the game and have his own Franchise Clay-free forever.

    Leave a comment:


  • Andrew
    replied
    If you want them removed from all leaderboards it's easier to just delete them from the game I think. But if people want to keep them and umd wants to see his leaderboards without them it's pretty easy to do. As a test I removed Woodbury and Chavez from the seasonal batting averages:

    http://www.simgamingnetwork.com/blb/...100&team_id=13

    This page is just a copy so the actual page still includes them:

    http://www.simgamingnetwork.com/blb/...100&team_id=13

    Leave a comment:


  • Z
    replied
    Originally posted by Andrew View Post
    If you want I can probably create a duplicate of the DVS batting/pitching leaders page in StatsLab to leave them off. I'd have to look at the code but I think it would just be a matter of modifying it to exclude their player ID's which is pretty simple.
    Could probably do the same for the other leaderboards too.

    Not sure what we could do for the game-generated stats though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Andrew
    replied
    Originally posted by umd View Post
    Now that I've had this franchise as long as I have, I would like them deleted. They are clogging up all my team history and pages. It's my franchise now, but in the spirit of including everyone in a vote since it impacts everyone, I planned to put up a proposal to delete the Virginia 7+ from my team archives if possible minus Woodbury. I feel he can be the logo of cheating around here in the Hall of Fame. It annoys me none of my players can be leaders in our franchise stats because of a ton of edited players.
    If you want I can probably create a duplicate of the DVS batting/pitching leaders page in StatsLab to leave them off. I'd have to look at the code but I think it would just be a matter of modifying it to exclude their player ID's which is pretty simple.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkn20
    replied
    Originally posted by umd View Post
    Now that I've had this franchise as long as I have, I would like them deleted. They are clogging up all my team history and pages. It's my franchise now, but in the spirit of including everyone in a vote since it impacts everyone, I planned to put up a proposal to delete the Virginia 7+ from my team archives if possible minus Woodbury. I feel he can be the logo of cheating around here in the Hall of Fame. It annoys me none of my players can be leaders in our franchise stats because of a ton of edited players.
    That's what I meant. They should be removed

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • umd
    replied
    Originally posted by Sharkn20 View Post
    What about deleting the date of players under Clay's hand? They don't deserve to be around and mess up other player which the owners putted all their effort in...

    Was this discussed already? I think is rubbish for you guys

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
    Now that I've had this franchise as long as I have, I would like them deleted. They are clogging up all my team history and pages. It's my franchise now, but in the spirit of including everyone in a vote since it impacts everyone, I planned to put up a proposal to delete the Virginia 7+ from my team archives if possible minus Woodbury. I feel he can be the logo of cheating around here in the Hall of Fame. It annoys me none of my players can be leaders in our franchise stats because of a ton of edited players.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkn20
    replied
    Originally posted by Delandis View Post
    Yes, it was discussed and agreed that despite the tumultuous time, it is part of the BLB history.

    A sort of pride that this league survived it.
    How curious is that... I wouldn't vote Yes to keep those players seasons

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Delandis
    replied
    Originally posted by Sharkn20 View Post
    What about deleting the date of players under Clay's hand? They don't deserve to be around and mess up other player which the owners putted all their effort in...

    Was this discussed already? I think is rubbish for you guys

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
    Yes, it was discussed and agreed that despite the tumultuous time, it is part of the BLB history.

    A sort of pride that this league survived it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkn20
    replied
    What about deleting the date of players under Clay's hand? They don't deserve to be around and mess up other player which the owners putted all their effort in...

    Was this discussed already? I think is rubbish for you guys

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Spectre
    replied
    Originally posted by Sharkn20 View Post
    Mel Woodbury was Clay´s creation?

    **ck say
    Mel Woodbury had his career season in 1995...at 38 years old

    .352/.485/.501, 55/69 SB, 134 RBI, 150 runs scored

    Honestly, his magical ability to put up transcendent numbers was ridiculous.

    For those of the oweners that started post-Clay, just look up these players for fun times (why do I still remember their names?):

    3B Yoritoki Maeda
    OF TJ Knudson
    SS Hector Chavez
    SP Pancho Herrera
    2B Dale O'Hegarty

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkn20
    replied
    Originally posted by Delandis View Post
    A (Indy not Fun) Clown original.
    Amazing player

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X