2016 Brewmaster's 1 SIM Complete - Next SIM Sun AM

[Carlos]

So anyway, is the league file updated or do I have issues?

Actually, don't answer that unless it's the first part.

[Matt]

I vote to give Dallas their $6m back. They are obvious in distress having the #1 budget in the game at $136m. In fact since I also have $136m I'll give Shark $6m to ease his financial burdens.

Then I'm making him attend a Dave Ramsey lecture.

[Z]

You sound like my wife.

Shark can be your esposa.

[Sharkn20]

Actually maybe you didn't pay nearly $8m in revenue sharing. Boom!

Dallas
Revenue Sharing $-5,867,811

Batavia
Revenue Sharing $-7,254,869

Add the last year revenue sharing, I said the last 2 years... Boom back!

[Matt]

Maybe you didnīt have to pay nearly $8M in Revenue sharing... Thatīs almost the salary of 2 great relievers or $8M is above the league average for scouting... Maybe setting up a ceiling like for both giving and receiving may seem a bit fair

Actually maybe you didn't pay nearly $8m in revenue sharing. Boom!

Dallas
Revenue Sharing $-5,867,811

Batavia
Revenue Sharing $-7,254,869

[Pat]

I laughed.

I was typing as fast as I could because I thought you'd beat me to it.

[Ryan]

You sound like my wife.

I laughed.

[Sharkn20]

You sound like my wife.

Come to the dinning room and stop playing games.

[liquidcrash]

Feel free to start a discussion.

To be honest I'd be hesitant to want to change anything without seeing at least a few seasons with the new FA demands and how OOTP '16 works.

That's about where I stand. I'd also hesitate to remove/curb revenue sharing without doing something to ensure that the smaller market / smaller budget teams don't get completely blown away by teams that might suddenly have a lot more money to spend than they ever will. I'd think any lowering of revenue sharing would have to be paired with removing the "win it all" bonuses, for instance.

[Pat]

Maybe setting up for both giving and receiving may seem a bit fair

You sound like my wife.

[Sharkn20]

Feel free to start a discussion.

To be honest I'd be hesitant to want to change anything without seeing at least a few seasons with the new FA demands and how OOTP '16 works.

Maybe you didnīt have to pay nearly $8M in Revenue sharing... Thatīs almost the salary of 2 great relievers or $8M is above the league average for scouting... Maybe setting up a ceiling like for both giving and receiving may seem a bit fair

[Matt]

Feel free to start a discussion.

To be honest I'd be hesitant to want to change anything without seeing at least a few seasons with the new FA demands and how OOTP '16 works.

[Z]

I think we should put something together about revenue sharing and vote

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

I think we're still in the discussion portion. If you or someone else wants to start a discussion thread with ideas in the Rules forum, go for it.

[Sharkn20]

I think we should put something together about revenue sharing and vote

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

[funclown]

I'm just very sensitive to anything that I feel is taking away from team's that are "small market" even if they are small market by their own doing or for a short time.

At the same time, I don't think it's fair that a team is forced to pay revenue sharing to go into negative cash. That seems odd and I never thought that was even possible in the game.

I think we all got sticker shock when we saw the bill at the end of the season. Its nothing major again adapt or die.

I don't think a payroll floor would work either cuz how do you over pay for guys?? Not fair either.