houck has been involved in more waiver/rule 5 controversies than anyone.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SIM COMPLETE - 1984 - FA 1
Collapse
X
-
Of course I knew it looked weird...Originally posted by Clay View PostLinty - Did you not think it was strange that he was on the Rule 5 list? Seems like someone would have noticed that a guy on an active roster was on the Rule 5 list and mentioned it.
But anytime I see a 24 year old catcher who put up 43 doubles in the BLB last year available... I'm going to jump at the chance to pick him up.
I lost on the waiver claim last time... and Morgantown got him... this time I was hoping he'd slip through...
Some day, some day... Shelby Houck will be mine!!!California Kodiaks - GM - 1982-2013
Brewmaster's Cups: 1987
Import League Champions: 1987, 1989
Porter Division Champions: 1986, 1987, 1989, 1999, 2000
Import League Wild Card: 2001, 2003, 2004
Comment
-
That is weird... In my game he didn't have the "#" symbol which would indicate he was eligible for the rule 5. Did he in your game?Originally posted by Lintyfresh85 View PostOf course I knew it looked weird...
But anytime I see a 24 year old catcher who put up 43 doubles in the BLB last year available... I'm going to jump at the chance to pick him up.
I lost on the waiver claim last time... and Morgantown got him... this time I was hoping he'd slip through...
Some day, some day... Shelby Houck will be mine!!!OSFL: Lake County Extreme 2008-2028, 2010 Champions
BLB: Morgantown MoHawks
BBA: Star City Shooters
Comment
-
Either I missed him on the list, or he wasn't listed in my game.Originally posted by Lintyfresh85 View PostYep he was on the list of Rule 5 draft guys... he was my first choice in my draft list.OSFL: Lake County Extreme 2008-2028, 2010 Champions
BLB: Morgantown MoHawks
BBA: Star City Shooters
Comment
-
Not that I disagree with you, but someone should have noticed before the draft took place. If I had a guy that was supposed to be eligible and he was on my active roster, I would have said something, wouldnt you?Originally posted by Clay View PostThat's not a very "for the good of the league" attitude.
Comment
-
To play devil's advocate though... if you're not looking to add someone in the Rule 5, why would you look at the list?
I looked at my AAA, AA and A rosters to see if anyone had "the mark" and needed to go 40-man.... then I accessed the Rule 5 pool, but knew the only type of player I was looking for was a Pitcher... so that's what I looked at.
So, there's just one example of how someone could have missed it...
However, on the other side of the coin, had I seen Shelby Houck in the pool... I can guarentee my first reaction would have been a red flag and a message to Andrew.The Great One!
Too many rings to count.
Comment
-
Thats exactly what I did. I also scanned the list of eligible players to see if there was anyone I was interested in, but didn't notice him on the list...So I guess that falls on me, even though I wasn't expecting one of my BLB starters to be on the eligible draft list. If I have to lose him so be it... its only a game I think I will live.Originally posted by Clay View Post
I looked at my AAA, AA and A rosters to see if anyone had "the mark" and needed to go 40-man....
OSFL: Lake County Extreme 2008-2028, 2010 Champions
BLB: Morgantown MoHawks
BBA: Star City Shooters
Comment
-
True. Like I said, I can see it both ways. We need to protect the league, but this happens in one form or another every year.Originally posted by Clay View Post
However, on the other side of the coin, had I seen Shelby Houck in the pool... I can guarentee my first reaction would have been a red flag and a message to Andrew.
Comment
-
Blah...
You guys would have jumped at him as well... if you were looking at the list.
It's not a big deal... and I wasn't actually expecting to keep him... I was just hoping Morgantown had gone crazy and dropped Houck.California Kodiaks - GM - 1982-2013
Brewmaster's Cups: 1987
Import League Champions: 1987, 1989
Porter Division Champions: 1986, 1987, 1989, 1999, 2000
Import League Wild Card: 2001, 2003, 2004
Comment
-
You're wrong.... your choice to do it when you knew he wasn't eligible was wrong... and your wrong that everyone would have jumped at it is wrong.Originally posted by Lintyfresh85 View PostBlah...
You guys would have jumped at him as well... if you were looking at the list.
It's not a big deal... and I wasn't actually expecting to keep him... I was just hoping Morgantown had gone crazy and dropped Houck.The Great One!
Too many rings to count.
Comment
-
Left.Originally posted by Lintyfresh85 View PostSo if you add up all of those negatives... you get a right?
I'm guilty too, I guess. Though I had no idea my guy was on a roster. He's older and somewhat risky, so I didnt even check. My bad.
EDIT: So, since the guys that were picked are ineligible, do the other picks slide down since some of them were on my list?
Comment
Comment