2019 Week 1 Results.

[Guest]

A high-RR TE can most definitely draw the double coverage.

Open dialog is fine, but so often, people are just plain wrong. You need people involved who aren't speculating, but who *know* the answers. That's what irritates people about FOFC, but it is also the strength. There are a small handful of people who know the answers to some of these things and can speak with authority. But when they do, people get irritated that their pet theory is getting summarily dismissed as if with the wave of a hand. But believe me, I check out the discussion at some of the leagues I'm not in from time to time. There is a *ton* of misinformation out there about FOF that is accepted as fact, like this "0" double coverage thing. That's just pain incorrect. If that had come up at FOFC, it would have been shot down immediately and gotten no legs, (but some people would have been irritated about that...) But now I'll bet there are dozens of people who accept it as fact. *shurg*

[Guest]

Thanks for clearing that up, Ben.

[Guest]

from the help file


You may double-cover either the split end or the flanker in most cases.
Double-coverage means that a second defender (usually the free safety
or a nickel back) is assigned a responsibility to join the cornerback as
soon as the play begins. This doesn’t mean that double coverage is
impossible without this selection, as the defensive backs manning the
deep zones will join in when a receiver enters their zone.

perhaps this is what Yoda et all were talking about?

[Guest]

perhaps this is what Yoda et all were talking about?

Yeah, that's what he copied from the help file. But it seems to be talking about two different kinds of double coverage.