Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2037 Off-season

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nemesis
    replied
    Originally posted by Delandis View Post
    I see some pretty wild swings in ratings. Many of which match where the player was at the end of last season.

    Example: My star receiver started the season 53/53 according to the league scout after ending the season 60/60. Now after 2 weeks of exhibition games he's 62/62. Is it a way to show guys were not in game shape? Maybe a way to add extra worry whether your guy is done or just sat on his as in the off-season?
    I hate you for making this enter my mind.

    PS: fwiw, they used to do something similar in the original Head Coach for playstation. Not sure about the 2nd version of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sgran
    replied
    I'd love to complain about all the DEs I drafted failing to impress, but I'm just grateful that my LT didn't bust because I've had two in a row bust in SP.

    We're getting beat up in preseason, but I'm hoping that's because of the back-up QB. Wellins is playing well, well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Delandis
    replied
    I see some pretty wild swings in ratings. Many of which match where the player was at the end of last season.

    Example: My star receiver started the season 53/53 according to the league scout after ending the season 60/60. Now after 2 weeks of exhibition games he's 62/62. Is it a way to show guys were not in game shape? Maybe a way to add extra worry whether your guy is done or just sat on his as in the off-season?

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    I was wondering that, I did not expect my WR to go +8 from TC, although I did expect his ratings to be better coming out of the draft. I did wonder about vol but his BPR did not change a lick according to my scout.

    I think he'll drop slightly into the future stopping around 75ish. This is exactly what I wanted and I think I made the right choice at 1.3. Given what the top two corners did, there might be an argument that my guy should have gone 1.1 but I won't go there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkn20
    replied
    Originally posted by Aston View Post
    There's WRs aplenty out there
    Not like him ;) he is the top of the crap!! Haha

    Leave a comment:


  • Aston
    replied
    There's WRs aplenty out there

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkn20
    replied
    Good 2nd year SE picked after thr changes can't believe anyone wanted him.... you don't like to have good players in the slot / 4 WRs sets, don't you? :)

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    wow, my 2nd round pick Johnston dropped brutally, going from 30/50 to 29/29

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    I forgot to check out how the WRs went at the top of the draft. Was chuck right? Where'd the BPRs end up?

    I hate not having access to the game at work.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nemesis
    replied
    All these late 1sts seem to be better than my top 5 combine monsters... hmmmmm

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Well, Dole looks to be as advertised, but I guess I am going to have to pick up draft analyzer to really get my shit together. My late rounds have been 90% ass since FOF 7 came out. Camden Recker is a super stud monster bad ass king sweet candy juice mcgee though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nemesis
    replied
    Originally posted by Aston View Post
    I think Hickman was vol. I liked him, but the extreme movement in his static bars makes it look like vol to me. Contrast that with Chuck's 3rd round OG, who also had huge movement but not in his static bar. His RB just shot up, as his combine suggested it might.
    The fact that Hickman went -6 on me in TC still bugs me. Will be curious to see where he ends up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aston
    replied
    I think Hickman was vol. I liked him, but the extreme movement in his static bars makes it look like vol to me. Contrast that with Chuck's 3rd round OG, who also had huge movement but not in his static bar. His RB just shot up, as his combine suggested it might.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nemesis
    replied
    Originally posted by garion333 View Post
    The real FOF starts here.
    My QB still sucks

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Nemesis View Post
    We had alot of movement, but I dunno what any of it means.
    The real FOF starts here.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X