Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2038 Off-season

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sharkn20
    replied
    Originally posted by Rob View Post
    I think it is a fair strategy. No one is being "stolen". These guys are UFA's. They are free to sign with anyone. If you want to ensure that you sign a guy jack up the bonus and offer a one year deal.

    I am against adding FA rules that are not already implemented in the game. It makes it harder to keep track of for people that are in multiple leagues and adds more work for the commish as they have something else they have to worry about keeping track of.
    +1

    Leave a comment:


  • sawblade300
    replied
    Originally posted by Rob View Post
    I think it is a fair strategy. No one is being "stolen". These guys are UFA's. They are free to sign with anyone. If you want to ensure that you sign a guy jack up the bonus and offer a one year deal.

    I am against adding FA rules that are not already implemented in the game. It makes it harder to keep track of for people that are in multiple leagues and adds more work for the commish as they have something else they have to worry about keeping track of.
    I know the reasoning behind it. I've done it myself. Ya know...if you can't beat 'em, blah blah blah.

    I just think it takes the strategy out of creating a deal for a player. "Here. I have a ton of money. I'll throw it all at this guy and do it again next year." You don't see this in the real NFL. If I'm trying to build my team and see a guy in year 5, fresh off his rookie contract, and I think he can fit into my team's future. I'm going to offer him a 3/4 year deal. I want him for the future. I make a pretty good offer. Then in comes quick draw and offers a one year deal and there goes my future. Only to bid on him again the following year. It's just my opinion, but I think it's bogus.

    I'm not saying to make any rules, even though I'd like to see one. I'm just expressing my feelings about the one hit wonders. Trust me. I'm not losing sleep over it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    One of the reason 1 yr deals win over multiple year deals because the one year deal is usually ALL bonus.

    1 yr $1 mil sal, $13 mil bonus

    >

    2 yr $20 mil sal, $7 mil bonus

    The player will almost always take the 1 yr bonus deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • IrishGuy65
    replied
    If that's all I need to do... I have some adjustments to make in all my offers.

    With all my cap space, it shouldn't be a problem for us.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Rob View Post
    If you want to ensure that you sign a guy jack up the bonus and offer a one year deal.
    Actually, all you really need to usually do is jack up the bonus.

    I've won a few players this year because I've dumped most of my offer into bonus.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by sawblade300 View Post
    Dola:

    To elaborate, I think it's a bogus, BS way to get players. Unless the guy is a year 10 or older. I'd like to see a rule that you can't offer a player less years than he's asking, Unless he's a year 10 or older.

    I've never liked seeing a year 5/6 guy being "stolen" in a one year deal. Rubs me wrong. And I'm a pretty easy going guy.
    I think it is a fair strategy. No one is being "stolen". These guys are UFA's. They are free to sign with anyone. If you want to ensure that you sign a guy jack up the bonus and offer a one year deal.

    I am against adding FA rules that are not already implemented in the game. It makes it harder to keep track of for people that are in multiple leagues and adds more work for the commish as they have something else they have to worry about keeping track of.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    It's something I'm coming around on, even if I use 1 yr deals frequently.

    Leave a comment:


  • sawblade300
    replied
    Dola:

    To elaborate, I think it's a bogus, BS way to get players. Unless the guy is a year 10 or older. I'd like to see a rule that you can't offer a player less years than he's asking, Unless he's a year 10 or older.

    I've never liked seeing a year 5/6 guy being "stolen" in a one year deal. Rubs me wrong. And I'm a pretty easy going guy.

    Leave a comment:


  • sawblade300
    replied
    Originally posted by garion333 View Post
    New rule proposal: No more 1 yr deals from Boston.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nemesis
    replied
    Originally posted by garion333 View Post
    New rule proposal: No more 1 yr deals from Boston.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    New rule proposal: No more 1 yr deals from Boston.

    Leave a comment:


  • irabowman
    replied
    Originally posted by Aston View Post
    Got it -- forgot again. Sorry!
    Aston are you saying your getting old?

    Leave a comment:


  • Aston
    replied
    Got it -- forgot again. Sorry!

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Which player are you talking about?

    I haven't had a chance to see the stage. Can you update the HTML?

    Leave a comment:


  • Aston
    replied
    Hey Waco, how much was your bonus on that $20M deal that got *turned* down for a 3-year, largely salary deal averaging $17M? I thought you'd get that one.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X