Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-Season Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pre-Season Discussion

    Wow, I rarely miss on DBs....

    1st Round picks CB and SS both of them a bluff after Pre-2.... I am extremely dissapointed with both of them, glad I nailed my 2nd Round with a really nice dual threat RE
    Miami Sharks (BLB)
    * BLB Champions --> 2017, 2020.

    Ohio River Sharks (OSFL)
    * OSFL Bowl CHAMPION > 2036, 2047.

  • #2
    Every single one of my offensive linemen took a hit this sim. How is that possible? 10 O-linemen on the roster and every one of them drops?

    On the plus side, Mandel got a little bump.

    Overall, I had one TE and one DT crash and everybody else made pretty small moves. Should be pretty much a wash.

    Comment


    • #3
      Any chance we can get HTML updated?


      Baltimore Bulldogs - BLB since '84
      - Porter Champs: '92, '93, '97, '98, '01, '03, '06, '08, '12
      - Playoffs: '92, '93, '97, '98, '99, '01, '03, '06, '08, '12, '13, '14, '15, '16
      - Brewmaster's Cup: '01

      Comment


      • #4
        I had a Tackle go from mid 40's to 12 OVR and my second round CB went from reveal 77 to 57 after tc and now 37 future after this sim...

        I got lucky with Sipos though he was able to stay in the 70's although I had him in the 80's before this sim. I'll take that drop.
        San Francisco Bayhawks GM (2038 -)

        Comment


        • #5
          We did fair overall I think and this draft the biggest payoff of it will be a extra 1st rd pick in 44 draft so when I consider that this draft even looks little better to us.

          1.1 RB Schulz 78 - 79 - 77 We are very happy with 77 and hope he scores us lot of rushing TD and 1st downs, to make up for what appears to be a weaker passing game. Grade: A
          1.10 C Hernandez 70 - 71 33/75 We are very happy with this pick as he got a nice bump. He has a lot of development to reach his full potential but once he reaches it we figure he will still have a good 10 - 12 years to play with us. Grade: A+
          2.6 TE Bruce 49 - 46 - 45 We was really hoping he would bump between 50-55 but he fell but still we like the pick especially his avoid drops bar of 95 and BPR bar of 60 he could hopefully be the target or QB looks for on 3rd and 5s
          Grade: B-
          2.9 QB Cerf 38 - 36 - 29 This was a very disappointing pick and a wasted pick as we really felt he would turn out in 40's somewhere. Had he done that and with our plans of running lot of TE formations with him I would a given him a grade of C+. However he busted as far as I am concerned. Grade: F
          3.14 FB Blackwell 49 - 48 - 42 Overall we see him AVG and since FB Looker is in his last year or two we decided to gamble on him as Looker's replacement. Grade: C
          3.15 ILB 35 - 33 - 29 In what we thought what was a weak ILB class overall and needing to address this issue. We gambled that he might be a avg ILB, but he only hit fair. Grade:D+
          3.26 CB 40 - 37 - 33 I had high hopes when we had our first look at him. Could still be useful to team in his man to man def of 74. Grade: D
          4.28 QB 43 - 42 - 36 We interviewed this QB and got VOR but we still thought he was a 40's QB so we drafted him as a backup. This year I don't see him as a back up but unless FA is good to us next year he could be a weak starter next year or diffident backup. Grade: C-
          5.3 S 44 - 42 - 36 Here was another player we was hoping to hold or bump, but it did not happen. Main thing he has going for him is his INT bar of 66 Grade: D
          6.23 WR 30 - 30 - 31 This was only other bump we got in a player not really enough to make a difference but we will take it. We actually had several WR's we wanted to take earlier in draft but they kept getting taken before we was able to pick them. His main bar is a 76 BPR and then a 58 avoid drop but that has a long way needing developed. Grade: D
          7.24 TE 35 - 33 - 31 Kinda what we expected but if we were to run some TE formations we wanted best TE remaining. We are sad that he has extreme conflict with our #1 TE Rudy hopefully this does not effect Rudy's play. If anyone is reading this do you think it will effect his play? Grade F due to the conflict would of been D without.
          FA WR 28 - 28 - 24 Just need a back up WR Grade: F Won't consider this guy in my overall grade.

          OVERALL: Considering the future #1 pick and other picks we got I give this draft a B. Overall what we did in off season I am going with a A- As we picked up 56 & 42 QB, 48 G, 49 T, & 44 ILB . Last few seasons 8-8 has won our div so I think we could possibly contend for our div. If we do win it I will be tickled pink.

          Comment


          • #6
            I told you Hernandez was worth ir :)

            Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
            Miami Sharks (BLB)
            * BLB Champions --> 2017, 2020.

            Ohio River Sharks (OSFL)
            * OSFL Bowl CHAMPION > 2036, 2047.

            Comment


            • #7
              Really entertaining game, Waco. 45-44 with over 1000 yards of total offense. Were you doing something wacky with the GP? It looks like our backup QBs tore it up.

              Last game was interesting, too. Saw a holding in the end zone safety; that was a first!
              Float likeabutterflysting likeabee.

              Comment


              • #8
                You could say so. I went 0-50-50 on 1st down, 50-25-25 on 2nd down, and 100-0-0 on both 3rd and 4th down.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Rob View Post
                  You could say so. I went 0-50-50 on 1st down, 50-25-25 on 2nd down, and 100-0-0 on both 3rd and 4th down.
                  Rob is the King of expect the unexpected.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X