Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2024 Regular Season SIM 5 Complete - Next SIM Friday 11/24

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mike
    replied
    SC Zhang ... man, what a surprise. 11 saves and a 1.80 ERA.... I'm not excited for the implosion but if he continues this all year, it'll be astonsihing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkn20
    replied
    My 2 time BLB Champion Manager went from Legendary to Decent in 3 seasons and he retired after last season and he was the same guy, so yes Reputation is tied with results.

    Thanks for the Development bit guys, I didn't notice it before.

    Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Z
    replied
    Originally posted by Matt View Post

    Ya I said that...it's based off of record I believe. But I just don't see the talent. I picked my unproven manager because he is Good for Development and has a good rep with a lot of my guys, but it would be nice if there were some veteran managers out there or at least a few more guys that have been around the block with some success.
    I think those guys aren't as available because teams are overvaluing experience.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matt
    replied
    Originally posted by TheLetterZ View Post

    I was under the impression that reputation isn't necessarily an accurate description of ability. It simply describes how good the teams he coached are. Is that not the case?
    Ya I said that...it's based off of record I believe. But I just don't see the talent. I picked my unproven manager because he is Good for Development and has a good rep with a lot of my guys, but it would be nice if there were some veteran managers out there or at least a few more guys that have been around the block with some success.

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulC
    replied
    This is beginning to feel like it could be a long season in California...

    Leave a comment:


  • Z
    replied
    Originally posted by funclown View Post

    Basically when dealing with guys with little rep or no exp its really all you can go by?
    You can also read the description on the main tab of their profile. It can be illuminating.

    Leave a comment:


  • funclown
    replied
    Originally posted by TheLetterZ View Post
    The Relationships tab.
    Basically when dealing with guys with little rep or no exp its really all you can go by?

    Leave a comment:


  • Z
    replied
    The Relationships tab.

    Leave a comment:


  • funclown
    replied
    Also please note im terrible at making these screens blow out larger, but as you can see this guys rep isnt the greatest.

    Leave a comment:


  • funclown
    replied
    image_386.jpg
    Case in point check out Pat(AA). I'm not into won-loss records in the minors to be honest.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkn20
    replied
    Originally posted by funclown

    If you look at the coach you can get a glimpse on how your players respond to him before signing him. Also (not sure if its helps) lately I've looked for coaches with relative low exp but development of "excellent" and or "outstanding". Maybe these coaches just need a chance. Plenty of good coaches out there but seem to be poor at development.

    Plus funclown is cheap.
    Where is that development thing that you are saying?

    Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkn20
    replied
    Originally posted by PaulC

    I completely agree. It's been like that for a few years. I'm thinking that is why some of my guys don't develop the way I'd like. A bunch of crappy minor league coaches and no real way to replace them.
    The reputation of coaches is based directly with the results obtained by the teams that they were with. Nothing related with how they develop players, at least not yet. Same with the Scout ratings.

    They won't be better just because they have an excellent reputation. They are what they are, but we can't see the ratings no more, we have to guess them by the description of them.

    Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • funclown
    replied
    Originally posted by PaulC View Post

    I completely agree. It's been like that for a few years. I'm thinking that is why some of my guys don't develop the way I'd like. A bunch of crappy minor league coaches and no real way to replace them.
    If you look at the coach you can get a glimpse on how your players respond to him before signing him. Also (not sure if its helps) lately I've looked for coaches with relative low exp but development of "excellent" and or "outstanding". Maybe these coaches just need a chance. Plenty of good coaches out there but seem to be poor at development.

    Plus funclown is cheap.

    Leave a comment:


  • Z
    replied
    Originally posted by BDub View Post

    I can see your point here. I guess id like to hire a guy with a good track record rather than going for a guy with no rep.
    Sure, most people would. Like Delandis said, that's why most guys with good track records are already employed!

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulC
    replied
    Originally posted by Matt View Post
    The lack of personnel is disturbing. We got screwed when our manager and bench coach left. Everyone else has Legendary coaches...we have Unproven and Fair with nothing else to choose from.
    I completely agree. It's been like that for a few years. I'm thinking that is why some of my guys don't develop the way I'd like. A bunch of crappy minor league coaches and no real way to replace them.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X