Originally posted by fmonster
View Post
I feel like the 3-year rule is restrictive, but is it a bad way? I am not sure yet. I'm not able to go nuts and sign every FA I see anymore, but that's probably a good thing.
Those older players - maybe you get away with waiting til FA2, or maybe some team hoarding cap space decides it's OK to pay a player $6 mil after retirement. Or maybe you get away with a minimum, 30k bonus deal

In general, I feel: overall volume gets throttled back, but each offer is more high stakes. You have to pick and choose your fights. That's both an interesting new twist that is good for the league, and I can also see it as an annoyance.
Food for thought: once FA2 comes, there is nothing preventing anyone from seeing a stud come off of RFA and plopping down a 1 year, $26 million deal.
Comment