Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Free Agent spending

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by thenewchuckd View Post
    Hey - I never said bomber wasn't a great owner! He is right up there with the Astons of the world. I just can't seem to trade with him. Although, as bomber said, it is probably something I am doing wrong.

    I would much rather be in a league with bomber than 99% of the other FOF owners out there. The best part is randomly poking him and watching what happens. Plus I have it on authority that he is a king pin in the porn business.
    I'm waiting for the incoming "And Nemesis is a stupid stingy prick." post.
    Columbus Catfish (2020-2030 & 2036-2038)
    Huntsville Bulldogs (2043-present)

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Nemesis View Post
      I'm waiting for the incoming "And Nemesis is a stupid stingy prick." post.
      Now that you said it I can save my negativity for someone else.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by thenewchuckd View Post
        Now that you said it I can save my negativity for someone else.
        YES!!! I feel so helpful.
        Columbus Catfish (2020-2030 & 2036-2038)
        Huntsville Bulldogs (2043-present)

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Nemesis View Post
          I'm waiting for the incoming "And Nemesis is a stupid stingy prick." post.

          rofl, opens thy mouth and inserts the cleats and football

          Comment


          • #20
            Why did you guys get rid of the minimum years contract rule again?

            I'm too lazy to find the thread.


            Baltimore Bulldogs - BLB since '84
            - Porter Champs: '92, '93, '97, '98, '01, '03, '06, '08, '12
            - Playoffs: '92, '93, '97, '98, '99, '01, '03, '06, '08, '12, '13, '14, '15, '16
            - Brewmaster's Cup: '01

            Comment


            • #21
              Because the game polices itself fairly well.

              I've been giving Aston a hard time because last year he sucked up a handful of players on one year deals. All those deals made sense* as they were older players who didn't necessarily justify 3 year deals. All those players are now back on the market.

              What we're seeing now is a handful of younger players getting snatched up on one year deals presumably for tagging the next season with a long term deal then.

              Implementing a no sign and tag rule, which Aston pretty much confirmed will be going into place, will limit these signings. Instead of sniping to such a great extent, multi year deals will be required for teams who want to hold onto the player after the one season. Granted it moves it to a 2 year deal, which isn't a huge step up from one year, but $30 mil+ a year for more than a season is tough to justify for anyone other than QBs.

              But we got rid of the 3 year aspect because it left a bunch of older players for FA2, which made FA1 less interesting. That and the game does a decent job making it tougher to have a ton of extra cap space.

              Spoiler
              Last edited by garion333; 08-26-2015, 12:12 PM.

              Comment

              Working...
              X