Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1983 Rookie Draft

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Clay
    replied
    Originally posted by mahoney2 View Post
    I'm not sure I can take the wrath of the Trade Announcements forum.
    LOL. That's funny. But sad. But funny.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jistic
    replied
    LMAO!

    Ok time to pick now!

    Leave a comment:


  • mahoney2
    replied
    I'm ready to go...maybe we switch picks?
    I'm not sure I can take the wrath of the Trade Announcements forum.

    Leave a comment:


  • rubisco43
    replied
    Originally posted by mahoney2 View Post
    Maybe I should make my next pick into a poll question since i can't pick until 3pm, any suggestions?
    I'm ready to go...maybe we switch picks?

    Leave a comment:


  • mahoney2
    replied
    Maybe I should make my next pick into a poll question since i can't pick until 3pm, any suggestions?

    Leave a comment:


  • Z
    replied
    Originally posted by Sully View Post
    5 of my scouts had him 5-7-5, with another at 6-8-6
    5-7-5 was the majority and minimum opinion held by my scouts.

    Leave a comment:


  • mahoney2
    replied
    My guys loved Garcia outside of his power, I think he had an 8 in one category from a couple scouts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lintyfresh85
    replied
    Originally posted by dieselboy View Post
    That exactly what I had Heller at.

    My scouts were also high on Ivan Garcia.

    Good picks.
    I think my guys had Garcia at 6-6-2-6-6. No power, but can do just about everything else.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pat
    replied
    Originally posted by Sully View Post
    5 of my scouts had him 5-7-5, with another at 6-8-6
    That exactly what I had Heller at.

    My scouts were also high on Ivan Garcia.

    Good picks.

    Leave a comment:


  • mahoney2
    replied
    Come back next week Brad, we should be ready by then. Who's holding this whole thing up anyways?

    Leave a comment:


  • BradleyB
    replied
    let me know when pick 65 comes up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jistic
    replied
    Originally posted by Andrew View Post
    Correct. In basic terms Stuff = Striekouts, Movement = HR Allowed, Control = Walks. It's obviously not that simple but that's the basic correlation between ratings and stats.
    It is alot more in depth than that of course. After playing this game for awhile you pick up on what means what little better.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jistic
    replied
    Originally posted by Lintyfresh85 View Post
    How is that a prototypical strike out guy?

    Wouldn't a 4-7-4 indicate that the guy doesn't strike out many guys, but is hard to make solid contact on? Thus he'd have a low K/BB but a good OAVG? And with such high movement he should have one of the lowest HR allowed IMO.
    You're right. I had my ratings mixed up!

    Leave a comment:


  • Andrew
    replied
    Originally posted by Lintyfresh85 View Post
    How is that a prototypical strike out guy?

    Wouldn't a 4-7-4 indicate that the guy doesn't strike out many guys, but is hard to make solid contact on? Thus he'd have a low K/BB but a good OAVG? And with such high movement he should have one of the lowest HR allowed IMO.
    Correct. In basic terms Stuff = Striekouts, Movement = HR Allowed, Control = Walks. It's obviously not that simple but that's the basic correlation between ratings and stats.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riverman
    replied
    Originally posted by Lintyfresh85 View Post
    How is that a prototypical strike out guy?

    Wouldn't a 4-7-4 indicate that the guy doesn't strike out many guys, but is hard to make solid contact on? Thus he'd have a low K/BB but a good OAVG? And with such high movement he should have one of the lowest HR allowed IMO.

    That is the way I understand it too.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X