Well, Baseball America updated...

[Sharkn20]

Where can see if our players are rated in Top #200 Prospects list. Is it in the player development? I can't see it.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

[Carlos]

Well we can all see the other teams top 10. We can always shot out our orgs top 10 per our scout then compare it to other teams since its visible?

We can all see the top 20 in the html.

Maybe you guys thought I meant something else?

[funclown]

The ORG top 20 I believe is affected by your scout... I think.

Well we can all see the other teams top 10. We can always shot out our orgs top 10 per our scout then compare it to other teams since its visible?

[funclown]

Not exactly prospect related but holy smokes 17 likes my players a lot more than 16 did goddamn

Agreed.

Pawtucket still had a bare system, but now my guy thinks we at least have a few more journeyman. Guess thats good.

Oh and "5" seems different now compared to 16 especially contact. Seen a few guys rate a 5 but say "Should bat .220"

[Pat]

Hmm, that wouldn't seem right according to my scout's ratings of some guys.

Maybe it's different in 17 (and im sure some scout ratings have changed) and I never noticed. I'll check it out some more.

Yeah, I've had 17 for about an hour now so I could be wrong. Would love input from those who have tinkered more.

[Carlos]

The ORG top 20 I believe is affected by your scout... I think.

Hmm, that wouldn't seem right according to my scout's ratings of some guys.

Maybe it's different in 17 (and im sure some scout ratings have changed) and I never noticed. I'll check it out some more.

[Pat]

Oh not worried about the rankings. I know it's going to change a lot this time of year.

Just think it's odd that OSA is saying one prospect is better than the other and then reversing that in another report. Don't think I've seen that before.

The ORG top 20 I believe is affected by your scout... I think.

[Carlos]

Gotta remember this is when everything bounces around and the switch only adds to that.

Oh not worried about the rankings. I know it's going to change a lot this time of year.

Just think it's odd that OSA is saying one prospect is better than the other and then reversing that in another report. Don't think I've seen that before.

We went from 14th and three prospects to 26th and no prospects on the list. No complaining.

But like UMD said, the TPL is going to be wild until after the new year anyway.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Yeah the more I looked into it, OSA still had most of my guys with similar ratings as before, just top 100 randomness. And, Jamie Stillwell must've done some work on his changeup because it's now a potentially viable pitch and I may not be forced to make him a reliever.

jk 17 isn't bad but my scout can EAD

[Delandis]

Went from the 10th best system to the 15th with Corr and Joiner falling completely off the list. Gotta say this transition to 17 lowkey sucks.

We went from 14th and three prospects to 26th and no prospects on the list. No complaining.

But like UMD said, the TPL is going to be wild until after the new year anyway.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Went from the 10th best system to the 15th with Corr and Joiner falling completely off the list. Gotta say this transition to 17 lowkey sucks.

[umd]

Interesting to see Gotschall rated much higher (15) than McGraw (45) on the OSA list but McGraw ranked as Denver's top organizational prospect over Gotschall.

Gotta remember this is when everything bounces around and the switch only adds to that.

[Carlos]

Interesting to see Gotschall rated much higher (15) than McGraw (45) on the OSA list but McGraw ranked as Denver's top organizational prospect over Gotschall.

[mike]

Not exactly prospect related but holy smokes 17 likes my players a lot more than 16 did goddamn

[Delandis]

As expected, the switch to '17 is showing lots of movement.

We apparently have no talent in '17.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk